belay monkey.
tendon load

The tendon catches up slowly. This tells you when to push and when to wait.

Today's call
Getting started
Track a climb and your verdict appears here.
ACWR —

Start a session, log each route as you go. Cleaner data, less to remember.

What Belay Monkey tracks

The signals behind your verdict — what each one means and where you stand.

Your load over time

session load ACWR ratio sweet spot 0.8–1.3
No sessions yet — log a climb and your trend appears here.
Belay Monkey is a training aid, not medical advice. Sharp, pinpoint, or lasting finger pain means see a physio or hand specialist.
Your data stays in this browser only.

The science & sources

Every number Belay Monkey computes, where it comes from, and an honest line between what the research establishes and what's a calibrated estimate. Built so you can defend the tool to anyone who asks.

research peer-reviewed finding method adapted method estimate calibrated, not measured

The core premise

Belay Monkey exists to manage one problem: muscle strength outpacing tendon adaptation. A prospective longitudinal study tracked adolescent athletes across a season and found those with tendon strain ≥9% had a 2.3-fold higher risk of developing tendinopathy, with tendon force rising before symptoms appeared — attributed to "inadequate adaptation of tendon stiffness to increases in muscle strength."1 That's exactly the mechanism Belay Monkey catches.

Tendons adapt slowly to load that muscle has already outgrown. The whole tool keeps the rate of load increase inside what the tendon can follow.

Stage 1 — Session load score

Each climb becomes one number. The structure encodes a research finding; the constants are tuned.

session_load = intensity × volume × tissue_multiplier

Intensity dominates research

A systematic review of 34 studies found higher climbing intensity and bouldering raised overuse-injury risk, while volume was a weak, inconsistent predictor.2 So intensity can swing the score ~8× while volume swings it under 2×.

% of your limitintensity factor
≤60% (easy)1.0
80% (hard)3.5
100% (limit)8.0
beyond limit10.0

estimate The curve's shape follows from tendon mechanics; the values (3.5, 8.0…) are calibrated estimates real data would refine.

The method: session-RPE method

Load scoring (effort × duration) comes from session-RPE, validated across sports and for climbing, which captures general and local forearm exertion separately.3 A caveat shaping Belay Monkey: RPE works well for advanced climbers but tends to overestimate intensity for intermediates,4 so forearm pump is its own channel and grade alone isn't trusted.

Grip type, with real mechanics research

3D motion-capture measured full crimp at 28–37° wrist extension — the most of any grip — lengthening the finger flexors and raising load across the A2/A4 pulleys; open-hand stays mid-range with lower strain.5 Crimp is independently linked to overuse risk.2

gripmultiplierbasis
open / drag×1.00mid-range
half crimp×1.1514–17° ext.
full crimp×1.3028–37° ext.

Volume, compressed estimate

volume = 1 + log₂(1 + attempts/10)

A logarithm so volume nudges but never dominates: 10 tries ≈ 1.0, 40 ≈ 1.7.

Stage 2 — ACWR method

The headline gauge: is this week unusually hard versus what you're used to?

acute = load over last 7 days chronic = avg weekly load over 28 days ACWR = acute ÷ chronic

The acute-to-chronic comparison and its U/J-shaped injury curve come from established load research; a 2025 meta-analysis of 22 cohort studies rated the evidence good quality.6 Sweet spot 0.8–1.3.

ACWRzone
<0.8undertraining
0.8–1.3sweet spot
1.3–1.5caution
>1.5danger spike

Being honest about ACWR

ACWR is contested — critics show it doesn't consistently predict injury and that one ratio oversimplifies multifactorial risk.7 Belay Monkey treats it as a spike flag, not a predictor, and always subordinates it to the 24-hour tissue signal. Claim that much and it holds up.

Stage 3 — Monotony method

monotony = mean(daily load) ÷ stdev(daily load)

From the same framework. High monotony (>2.0) means dangerously samey training — the repetitive-load pattern most tied to tendon overuse, which ACWR alone misses.

Stage 4 — The override research

The rule protecting the whole system: the 24-hour tissue signal overrides every computed number. Tendinopathy comes on and recovers slowly, so a rising next-day signal beats any load estimate. Heavy-slow resistance builds the tendon; isometrics calm pain but aren't curative; structural strength work — not stretching or warm-ups — is what's shown to prevent shoulder and elbow injury.2

What Belay Monkey ignores on purpose

The same review found BMI, warm-ups/cool-downs, stretching, taping and hydration not associated with overuse risk.2 Wrist wearables (Garmin) are excluded for load too — climbing's mechanism is local tendon tension, which heart rate barely sees.

Sources

  1. Mersmann F, Domroes T, Tsai M-S, Pentidis N, Schroll A, Bohm S, Arampatzis A. Longitudinal Evidence for High-Level Patellar Tendon Strain as a Risk Factor for Tendinopathy in Adolescent Athletes. Sports Medicine – Open. 2023;9(1):83. doi:10.1186/s40798-023-00627-y — validates the premise
  2. Quarmby A, Zhang M, Geisler M, Javorsky T, Mugele H, Cassel M, Lawley J. Risk factors and injury prevention strategies for overuse injuries in adult climbers: a systematic review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2023;5:1269870. doi:10.3389/fspor.2023.1269870 — the backbone (34 studies)
  3. Mastrofini G, et al. Monitoring training load in climbing: a validation of the Session-RPE method. 2024. — load-scoring method
  4. Draper N, et al. Effect of Height on Perceived Exertion and Physiological Responses for Climbers of Differing Ability Levels. PubMed PMID: 32581917 — why RPE is weaker for intermediates
  5. Fischer G, Schneeberger M, Petter SA, et al. Motion Analysis of the Wrist and Finger Joints in Sport Climbing. Bioengineering. 2024;11(4):370. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11040370 — grip / wrist mechanics
  6. Qin Z, et al. Acute to chronic workload ratio (ACWR) for predicting sports injury risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2025;17:285. PubMed PMID: 41029871 — ACWR evidence base
  7. Impellizzeri FM, et al. Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio: conceptual issues and fundamental pitfalls. — the honest counterweight

Citation details are drawn from the published records; verify the DOI before formal use.

ready
00:00
Track each route as you climb it

Or log routes without the timer — just start a session and use “Log route” each time.

My portal

Every session you've logged, and how your body felt the morning after. Tap a check-in dot to record or update the 24-hour signal for that day.

the next-morning check

How your body feels ~24h later — the real readiness signal. Overrides every computed number.

Which area??
Pain 24h after (0 none · 10 severe)?
0

belay monkey.

A tendon-load tracker for climbers. Here's the 30-second tour.

1
Track my climb — your main tool

Start a session and log each route the moment you finish it — send or attempt, plus how it felt. Logging fresh means cleaner data and nothing to remember later. This is the recommended way to use Belay Monkey.

2
Forgot to track? Quick-log

If you didn't track live, there's a quick-log link at the bottom to enter a whole session at once as a backup. Less precise, but better than nothing.

3
The next-morning check

The most important habit: the morning after, rate how each body part feels. Pain 24h later — not during the climb — is the real signal, and it overrides every number Belay Monkey computes.

4
Your verdict & the science

The gauge up top reads Build / Hold / Deload / Rest based on your recent load. Curious how it's calculated?

Every number is explained, with citations, on the page — tagged honestly as research, method, or estimate.